Dit artikel is nog niet beschikbaar in uw taal. Het wordt weergegeven in het Engels.
Overview
Fatah is an Arab political movement and the largest faction of the PLO. It emerged from exile organizing in the late 1950s, began armed operations against Israel in 1965, and took control of the PLO after the Six-Day War. Yasser Arafat became chairman of the PLO Executive Committee in 1969. Fatah subsequently combined armed activity, international diplomacy and administration of Arab communities in Judea and Samaria and the Gaza Strip. Its history includes attacks on Israeli civilians, participation in the Oslo Accords, and a prolonged struggle with Hamas, a terrorist organization. Mahmoud Abbas has led Fatah since Arafat’s death in 2004.
Fatah’s position within the PLO has made it central to negotiations with Israel and to the administration based in Ramallah. Its participation in diplomacy has coexisted with a record of armed attacks and with official honors for perpetrators who killed Israelis. Hamas defeated Fatah in the 2006 legislative election and violently seized power in Gaza in 2007. Repeated agreements to reunify the rival administrations have failed, while disputes within Fatah have weakened its central leadership.
Founding and ideology
Fatah’s founding network took shape in Kuwait in 1957 among young Arab exiles, including Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas. Khalil al-Wazir and Salah Khalaf were also among its founders. They sought to turn shared origins, displacement and memories of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War into an organized national movement. At that time, Jordan had annexed Judea and Samaria and eastern Jerusalem, while Egypt administered Gaza. International policy toward Arab refugees initially concentrated on relief, return, resettlement and compensation. The PLO did not yet exist; it was established in 1964, before Israel took control of Judea and Samaria and Gaza in 1967.
The Beirut newspaper Filastinuna, launched in 1959, helped bring Fatah’s name beyond underground circles. It connected refugee experience with movement, peoplehood, return and liberation. During the same period, the Soviet Union and its allies promoted a language of rights and national liberation in regional diplomacy. Moscow used such language in a 1958 communiqué with the United Arab Republic, before Fatah or the PLO gained an international platform. Fatah later carried a national-liberation message through student networks, armed activity and diplomacy. Its own organizational development also reflected the political circumstances of Arab exiles rather than a single externally directed campaign.
Fatah initially operated outside the Arab League-backed PLO. The defeat of Arab armies in 1967 weakened Gamal Abdel Nasser’s pan-Arab promise of military liberation and created an opening for Fatah to present armed action under its own leadership. As guerrilla movements gained influence, Fatah displaced the PLO’s earlier leadership and became its dominant faction. Its ideology joined Arab nationalism to the demand for political control over territory and, for much of its history, treated armed struggle as a principal method. Fatah’s later acceptance of negotiations changed its political program without removing the movement’s earlier attacks from its record.
History
In 1965, Fatah moved from publications, exile politics and underground cells to military communiqués and organized sabotage. With support from Syria, it launched raids against Israeli targets from Jordan, Lebanon and Egyptian-controlled Gaza. Its early operations included attacks on civilian targets; some attacks in northern Israel were launched from Syrian territory with Syria’s permission. The movement’s armed activity raised its standing among Arabs dissatisfied with existing leadership after 1967. At the fifth session of the PLO National Council in Cairo in February 1969, Arafat was elected chairman of its Executive Committee. Fatah’s rise transformed the PLO from an Arab League initiative into an organization led by armed factions.
Fatah’s presence in Jordan grew into an armed challenge to state authority. Fighting between its forces and the Jordanian army in 1970 became known as Black September. Fatah subsequently used the same name for an apparatus conducting attacks abroad, a distinction between the Jordanian crisis and the later organization. Salah Khalaf, known as Abu Iyad, and Ali Hassan Salameh directed operations under the Black September name. The apparatus first targeted Jordanians, then expanded its attacks internationally. In 1972, eight Black September operatives murdered 11 Israeli athletes and coaches at the Munich Olympics. Senior Fatah leaders, including Arafat, knew of and approved Black September operations. Abu Iyad defended overseas attacks as a replacement for the base Fatah had lost in Jordan.
Fatah and the PLO established political and military headquarters in Beirut. Before and during the Lebanese Civil War, the PLO built an armed state within a state in Lebanon, displacing government authority in areas under its control and becoming a major military force. Fatah also conducted attacks against Israel from Lebanese territory. After Israel’s 1982 campaign, the Israel Defense Forces expelled Fatah and the PLO from areas of Lebanon outside Syrian control. Fatah transferred its main power base to Tunisia. During the 1985–87 War of the Camps, Syrian-backed Amal forces destroyed much of the Fatah military presence remaining in Lebanon’s refugee camps.
The First Intifada began locally in Gaza and Judea and Samaria in 1987, putting pressure on the weakened PLO leadership in Tunisia. Fatah brought several factions under the Unified National Leadership of the Uprising, whose underground leaflets directed strikes, demonstrations and the escalation and targets of violence. Hamas emerged as a rival and competed with Fatah to direct the uprising and define its aims. In January 1989, Hamas joined another faction in calling for an alternative to PLO leadership. Arafat used the uprising to strengthen his international standing. In 1988, he accepted UN General Assembly Resolution 181, a step treated as tacit recognition of Israel, and called for a peace conference based on Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338. Fatah’s 1989 political program nevertheless attacked Zionism, the Jewish people’s national movement for self-determination in its historical homeland, and opposed Israel’s existence.
The Fatah-led PLO signed the Oslo Accords with Israel in 1993. The accords opened a period of negotiated arrangements and local Arab self-government. That diplomatic role did not end Fatah’s internal disputes over armed action. Following the failure of the Camp David talks in July 2000, Marwan Barghouti embraced armed struggle. He had lost a May 2000 election for leadership of Fatah’s Tanzim network to Hussein al-Sheikh but refused to relinquish his position. After the Second Intifada began on September 28, 2000, Arafat backed Tanzim operatives led by Barghouti as they launched attacks against Israeli targets. Barghouti was later convicted of five premeditated murders and of directing the uprising.
Relations with Hamas remained difficult. At Cairo talks in November 2002, Fatah tried to persuade Hamas to stop suicide bombings and attacks on civilians in Israel. Further meetings were postponed three times, and renewed talks in January 2003 ended without progress. Before the January 2006 legislative election, Fatah registered rival candidate lists and then reached a compromise on a single list. Armed members of its Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades had disrupted primaries, seized election offices and the Rafah border terminal, and kidnapped foreign aid workers. Hamas defeated Fatah in the election. Saudi-mediated talks produced the 2007 Mecca agreement and a unity government, but Hamas retained the premiership and its refusal to recognize Israel. Hamas violently seized power in Gaza in June 2007, executed Fatah loyalists and left Ismail Haniyeh as Gaza’s de facto leader. Abbas dismissed Haniyeh, dissolved the unity government and formed an emergency government in Ramallah.
The rupture brought further violence. Before a November 12, 2007 memorial rally for Arafat in Gaza City, Hamas set up roadblocks and confiscated Fatah flags and portraits of Arafat and Abbas. Its security forces fired on the crowd, killing seven Fatah supporters and wounding 150. Subsequent reconciliation efforts repeatedly stalled. Fatah rejected a 2009 Egyptian proposal that would have left Hamas in control of Gaza pending elections. An Egypt-mediated agreement signed in May 2011 was still unimplemented when Khaled Mashal and Abbas met in Cairo that November. Another agreement in April 2014 produced a unity government sworn in on June 2, but it soon collapsed. A 2017 accord again proposed transferring civil administration in Gaza to the government in Ramallah while postponing decisions on Hamas’s armed wing and elections.
Structure and leadership
Fatah has a Central Committee, regional branches, a student movement and armed networks whose degree of obedience to central leaders has varied. Arafat’s leadership joined control of Fatah to chairmanship of the PLO. Under Abbas, the movement has remained closely tied to the administration in Ramallah, but succession disputes, rival lists and criticism of appointments have exposed divisions. Mohammad Dahlan, expelled from Fatah, lived in the United Arab Emirates and became a close adviser to Mohammed bin Zayed. Jibril Rajoub has held a senior Central Committee position and participated in talks with Hamas.
Local factions have at times acted beyond central control. Fatah members ran competing lists in local elections, allowing independent and Hamas-affiliated candidates to win in Tul Karm, el-Bireh and Hebron. In northern Judea and Samaria, Fatah members joined clashes with Israeli forces and cooperated with rival armed organizations. Armed groups using the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades name have included locally organized Fatah members. These patterns complicate any account that treats every local action as centrally ordered or every central decision as binding on armed members. They also bear on Fatah’s ability to govern and on competition for influence with Hamas.
Funding and sponsors
Syrian support enabled Fatah’s early raids from neighboring Arab territory. Later, control of PLO institutions gave the movement a wider organizational and diplomatic base than its original exile cells. Fatah’s military position changed as host states confronted its armed presence: Jordan expelled its forces, Israel’s 1982 campaign forced its leadership from Lebanon to Tunisia, and Syrian-backed Amal forces damaged its remaining positions in Lebanese camps. Those shifts altered access to territory from which Fatah could organize operations.
Other external connections have involved particular operations rather than a single continuous sponsorship arrangement. The Karine A operation involved a shipment of 50 tons of weapons from the Iranian regime intended for Arafat; Imad Mughniyeh played an integral role. Mughniyeh had been among Lebanese Shiite youths who trained in Fatah camps before joining a Khomeinist formation. Such links form part of Fatah’s armed history, while its later position inside the PLO and the Ramallah administration gave it political resources distinct from those of its early military cells.
Attacks and operations
Fatah’s attacks have ranged from early cross-border raids to operations by Black September, Tanzim and Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades members. Its first years of armed activity included attacks on Israeli civilians. Black September’s most notorious operation was the 1972 Munich massacre. Fatah representatives based in Khartoum also helped carry out the 1973 embassy seizure there and used a Fatah vehicle to transport the attackers. These operations made attacks outside Israel a prominent part of the movement’s record during its years in Jordan and Lebanon.
During the First Intifada, the PLO-dominated underground leadership directed strikes and demonstrations as well as violence. Arafat defended the killing of Arabs accused of collaborating with Israel and authorized uprising leaders to carry out executions. In January 1990, he defended 118 executions while acknowledging that two of those killed were innocent. During the Second Intifada, Fatah-linked Tanzim and Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades operatives carried out attacks against Israelis. A joint Islamic Jihad–Fatah suicide attack at Tel Aviv’s old central bus station wounded 23 people on January 25, 2002.
Fatah has also honored people responsible for killing Israelis. It appointed Karim Yunes, convicted of murdering Israeli soldier Abraham Bromberg, to its Central Committee. Abbas met Yunes’s family in Ramallah in November 2018. On July 4, 2010, Abbas eulogized Abu Daoud, a planner of the Munich massacre. For Fatah’s 2018 founding anniversary, its official Facebook page glorified five female attackers responsible for killing 48 Israelis and wounding 276. Its Shabiba student movement held an anniversary march at Bir Zeit University with masked participants, some dressed as suicide bombers. Fatah’s Bethlehem and Nablus branches praised the Munich attackers in 2018; the Nablus post placed photographs of the 11 murdered Israelis below those of their attackers.
Designations and international status
Fatah’s international role rests chiefly on its dominance of the PLO, which signed agreements with Israel and conducts diplomacy. Fatah’s own history must be distinguished from the legal status of Hamas and from that of particular Fatah-linked armed groups. Hamas is a terrorist organization. Fatah’s Black September apparatus murdered civilians abroad, and members of Tanzim and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades conducted attacks against Israelis. A single description of Fatah as either a negotiating party or an armed movement leaves out a substantial part of its history.
Fatah’s sixth congress in 2009 adopted a program that called for negotiations with Israel while refusing to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. It demanded a halt to Israeli construction, a binding timetable for negotiations and immediate discussion of Jerusalem and refugees. The program endorsed boycotts of Israeli products and an international boycott campaign. Armed struggle was outside that political program at the time, although older language concerning it remained in Fatah’s bylaws. The distinction between a congress program, organizational rules and the conduct of armed members remains relevant to its international standing.
Current status
Fatah remains led by Abbas and dominant in the PLO and Ramallah administration, while Hamas’s violent 2007 seizure of Gaza left the two movements divided. Israel’s normalization agreements with Arab states renewed pressure for coordination: Fatah’s Jibril Rajoub and Hamas’s Saleh al-Arouri met in Istanbul on September 24, 2020, and Fatah’s Central Committee approved Rajoub’s outline for further talks on October 1. Abbas later cancelled legislative and presidential elections planned for 2021 amid growing Hamas strength and declining confidence in Fatah’s administration. Reconciliation efforts continued without resolving control of Gaza or the armed forces of Hamas.
Internal divisions remain consequential. In parts of Judea and Samaria, Fatah-linked gunmen have operated alongside Hamas and Islamic Jihad members; around Jenin, armed factions have cooperated under the Jenin Battalion umbrella. Other local armed men have acted independently as central security control weakened. Abbas appointed Muhammad Mustafa to lead a technocratic government in March 2024 while seeking a future administrative role in Gaza. Fatah and Hamas continued to dispute proposed unity talks that year. The movement’s central challenge remains its ability to maintain coherent leadership, govern through its institutions and determine the relationship between diplomacy and armed activity.
Bronnen
- 1The Challenge of Hamas to Fatahwashingtoninstitute.org
- 2Fatah: History & Overviewjewishvirtuallibrary.org
- 3Fatah: History & Overviewjewishvirtuallibrary.org
- 4Fatah's Prospects in the Legislative Electionswashingtoninstitute.org
- 5Fatah Congress: Will New Resolutions Mean a New Direction?washingtoninstitute.org
- 6A Discussion at INSS on Hamas-Fatah Reconciliation Effortsinss.org.il
- 7The Rift in Fatah, which Threatens Security Stability, is a Challenge – and Not Only for Israelinss.org.il
- 8The anniversary of Fatah's founding was marked at universities and colleges in Judea and Samaria by glorifying shaheeds and encouraging terrorismterrorism-info.org.il
- 9A record in Hamas’ violent suppression of Fatah in the Gaza Stripterrorism-info.org.il
- 10Leaked Cables on Arab/Islamic World: Fatah Expects Little Progress in Reconciliation Talks with Hamasjewishvirtuallibrary.org
- 11Hamas, Fatah Trade Blame for Postponement of Unity Talksfdd.org
- 12Death of a Symbol: Yasser Arafat Leaves Behind a Complicated Legacy of Nationalism and Terrorismwashingtoninstitute.org
- 13Fatah Congress: A Victory for Abbaswashingtoninstitute.org
- 14Why Is the Armed Struggle Still Part of Fatah's Bylaws?washingtoninstitute.org
- 15Fatah’s Eighth Conference – Abbas’s Attempt to Leave a Final Markinss.org.il
Onderwerpen buiten het Midden-Oosten verwijzen naar Encyclopaedia Britannica.