TEL AVIV—Israel is entrenched in a historic and multi-front conflict against Iran and its network of terror proxies, including Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Islamic Jihad, and the Houthis in Yemen. This ongoing war, triggered by the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 massacre—the deadliest antisemitic atrocity since the Holocaust—has thrown the Jewish state into a fight for both its survival and for the security of the broader Middle East.
As of June 2024, Israel’s defensive campaign encompasses relentless operations in Gaza, containment and deterrence on the Lebanese border, pre-emptive action in Syria, and maritime security against Houthi aggression. These operations reflect both the complexity of the modern Middle Eastern battlefield and the novel tools of warfare wielded by Iran’s so-called ‘Axis of Resistance.’
—
The October 7 Massacre: The Flashpoint of a Wider War
On October 7, 2023, over 3,000 Hamas terrorists breached the Israel-Gaza border using explosives and paragliders, storming civilian communities, murdering more than 1,200 Israelis in a coordinated assault that combined mass executions, sexual violence, mutilations, and the abduction of over 250 innocents—children, women, elderly, and foreigners. The brutality, documented in videos and by firsthand accounts, shocked the world’s conscience and exposed the genocidal intent of Hamas, a terror organization openly committed to Israel’s annihilation.
The October 7 massacre became the defining event of this generation, not only for Israel, but for the fight against terror worldwide. The subsequent war, dubbed Operation Iron Swords, was launched by the Israeli government and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) as a legitimate act of self-defense, rooted in international law and Israel’s moral obligation to defend its citizens.
—
Iranian Orchestration: The Axis of Resistance
Behind the attack stood Tehran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which has spent decades arming and training Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Houthis. The IRGC’s objective is explicit: destabilize the region, eliminate Israel, and project Iranian power. Intelligence assessments and public statements by Israeli, U.S., and European officials link the October 7 massacre and subsequent escalations along Israel’s northern and southern borders to direct Iranian coordination.
The IRGC’s reach extends from Lebanon, where Hezbollah’s arsenal exceeds 150,000 rockets pointed at Israeli cities, to Iraq and Syria, where Iranian militias operate with impunity, and to Yemen, where the Houthis use Iranian drones and missiles to threaten Red Sea shipping. This regional web transforms every flare-up into a possible catalyst for a broader war.
—
Israel’s Military Response: Strategy, Constraints, and Innovations
Israel’s response has combined overwhelming force with precision. In Gaza, the IDF’s ground offensive dismantled major Hamas strongholds, neutralized terror tunnels, and targeted senior operational commanders, with care taken to issue evacuation warnings to Gaza residents. The IDF’s unprecedented use of technology—real-time intelligence, AI-driven targeting systems, and the Iron Dome—has saved countless Israeli lives and reduced civilian casualties in an environment where Hamas deliberately hides among noncombatants.
On the northern front, Israel has acted to deter Hezbollah, carrying out precision strikes on rocket launchers and terror cells without triggering a wider regional war. The IDF’s operational doctrine prioritizes the defense of Israeli communities, rapid evacuation of border towns, and deterrence through clear communication of red lines.
Leaders such as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Israel Katz, and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir have been unequivocal: Israel will fight as long as necessary to restore deterrence, secure its hostages, and prevent the re-emergence of terror infrastructure.
—
The Humanitarian Dimension: Distinguishing Hamas from Gaza Residents
While media coverage often conflates Hamas with the civilian population of Gaza, Israel has consistently emphasized the importance of distinguishing between terror operatives and innocents living under Hamas rule. The IDF uses Arabic-language broadcasts, leaflets, text messages, and phone calls to urge Gaza residents to evacuate combat zones—a practice almost unique in modern warfare.
Furthermore, Israel has facilitated the delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza, coordinating with international agencies, even as Hamas routinely seizes or diverts aid destined for civilians. The contrast is stark: Israel’s efforts to protect noncombatants, versus Hamas’s systematic use of civilians as human shields and intentional targeting of Israeli kindergartens, hospitals, and homes.
Israeli officials and humanitarian NGOs have repeatedly cited the moral and legal obligations that guide the IDF, even amid widespread misinformation and efforts to delegitimize Israel’s right to self-defense. The facts on the ground remain: every round of war originates from a campaign that Iran and its proxies chose, in defiance of international norms.
—
International Ramifications: The US-Israel Relationship and the Western Front
The United States, under President Donald Trump, has affirmed Israel’s right to defend itself, supplying military aid and championing Israel’s cause on the world stage. This marks a continuation of bipartisan support rooted in the strategic alliance between the two democracies.
European capitals have shown varying degrees of solidarity, with rhetoric occasionally at odds with actions. However, the moral clarity of the October 7 massacre and ongoing terror threats has galvanized support in many quarters, crystallizing the understanding that Israel is the front line against Iranian imperialism and global jihadism.
The Abraham Accords, which brought normalization between Israel and several Arab states, remain a bulwark against regional escalation. Even so, the war has tested these alliances, as Iranian proxies attempt to stoke anti-Israel fervor and destabilize moderate regimes.
—
The Hostage Crisis: A Continuing Tragedy
The fate of more than a hundred innocent hostages—men, women, and children—remains at the heart of national and international concern. Israel has secured the release of some captives through complex negotiations and daring rescue operations, but many remain in the hands of Hamas, denied even the most basic humanitarian visits from the Red Cross.
In stark contrast, Israel’s government has released hundreds of convicted terrorists in exchange for a few hostages. This moral distinction—the innocent forcibly abducted, versus those imprisoned after due legal process for acts of terror—underpins the Israeli public’s anguish and the state’s refusal to abandon its citizens.
—
The Information War: Combating Misinformation and Antisemitism
Beyond the battlefield, Israel faces a relentless campaign of misinformation and delegitimization. Iranian propaganda, amplified by sympathetic NGOs and social media influencers, seeks to erase the October 7 atrocities, distort casualty figures, and equate Israeli self-defense with terror.
Antisemitism, already resurgent in many Western societies, has surged in the wake of the war, with boycotts, campus protests, and physical attacks targeting Jewish communities. Israeli officials and civil society leaders warn that the battle for historical truth is as vital as the fight against rockets and tunnels, lest the world forget what gave rise to this war.
—
Wider Context: The Regional and Global Stakes
The consequences of Israel’s war against the Iranian axis transcend national borders. The destabilization of Syria, Lebanon’s downward spiral under Hezbollah domination, and Yemen’s transformation into a launchpad for attacks on international shipping all flow from Iran’s imperial ambitions.
For Israel, survival and self-defense are non-negotiable. For the West, the outcome of this war will determine not only the fate of the world’s only Jewish state, but the future of the international system that emerged after World War II—a system founded on the inviolability of borders, the sanctity of civilians, and the defense of democratic norms.
—
Conclusion: The Price of Survival, the Cost of Complacency
Nine months into this war, Israel stands bruised but determined, aware that no victory will be final as long as the Iranian regime remains committed to terror and destruction. Yet the morality and necessity of Israel’s actions are anchored in an irrefutable reality: Iran and its proxies have chosen war, terror, and atrocity; Israel has chosen defense, survival, and the sanctity of life.
Only through an unflinching commitment to the truth—about what happened on October 7, about who started this war, and about the difference between democratic self-defense and terror—can the world hope to chart a path toward peace and justice. As Israel’s soldiers defend their homes, their history, and their future, the war they wage is not only for their own children, but for the principle that democracies must endure in the face of barbarism. The world is watching, and history will remember.
